Apr 19th, 2007

I’m sick. And also some words about Va. Tech

First off the simple stuff. I’m sick. I’m so sick in fact that I haven’t even been able to look at the screen for too long because I get nauseated. It’s a simple stomach bug, but this simple stomach bug has caused me to spew from both ends of my digestive tract for two days now. It’s not a pretty picture. Really. I feel a little bit better today, but I have to make sure to keep eating otherwise my energy drops extremely low.

Virginia Tech
You know, part of me wonders what I can say about this tragedy that hasn’t already been said in the news countless times. I was on MSNBC AOL News yesterday where apparently someone had posted a blog with two plays that the shooter had written. Granted, the writing style is a bit pedantic and elementary, but that’s not the point. You should be reading it for its content and the basic idea. Needless to say, the guy had a lot of anger.

One play has him talking about how old people (read: authority) need to be killed because it’s their responsibility to die and make way for the younger people already. All old people do is make life a pain in the ass for those younger. His words, not mine.

The next play is a bit more graphic and is about a stepfather trying to make peace with his stepson, but the stepson accuses him of molesting him and killing the boy’s father to sleep with the boy’s mom. Rather crude, but ultimately what happens is actually some compassion for the stepfather because of miscommunication. Miscommunication (if I read it correctly) is the theme of the play, and how others can twist your words.

In both plays, there’s the vein of miscommunication leading to one person being accepted by society and the other being seen as the villain, when in fact that person is the victim. And that sounds very telling of his life. Apparently he had made some overtures at some young women while at VTech, and they alerted the authorities on him. Imagine- you’re painfully shy, you finally muster up the courage to talk to a girl, and the girl calls the authorities because you’re “weird”. I’m not blaming the girls at all– they may have done what they felt was right; but I can see how this sort of rejection would be humiliating. EDIT: This, in a news article on MSNBC as to how he was mocked as a kid:

Once, in an English class, the teacher had the students read aloud and, when it was Cho’s turn, he just looked down in silence, Davids recalled in an interview with The Associated Press. Finally, after the teacher threatened to give him a failing grade for participation, Cho started to read in a strange, deep voice that sounded “like he had something in his mouth,” Davids said.

“As soon as he started reading, the whole class started laughing and pointing and saying, ‘Go back to China,’” Davids said.

Note that Cho was from South Korea and was a green card holder. Kids are cruel.

Although there’s not any way in which I would espouse violence, a person with that much anger built up for years may have felt that was his only option. When I read the plays and some comments regarding it, many people had the view, “Yeah well he’s fucking crazy what do you expect,” and some had the gall to write, “Wow I could write so much better than that.” Sad.

I think this idea of ostracizing those who are not similar to yourself is what I want to talk about in the screenplay that I’m working on. (Oh right, I hadn’t mentioned that yet– yes, I’m working on writing a movie.) The movie will be about how people with mental illnesses are seen as freaks and weirdos and how no, they’re not freaks and weirdos, they just have illnesses that many others don’t. No one goes around saying, “You’re WEIRD because you have diabetes,” so why say that to a person with schizophrenia?

Another thing is that we, as a society, are so much more conditioned to accept people with self-inflicted addictions (alcohol, heroin, cocaine) and support these people, but when it comes to mental illness, we just go, “WEIRD.” Just look at Britney Spears, Lindsey Lohan, and their ilk. If we’re so accepting of them and say, “Good job! You went to rehab,” why not say, “You were depressed and went to a mental facility and got better. Good for you.”

And with that I’m out.

Responses

I think the single most important issue here is, how did he have such easy access to guns? I personally think this incident should be a wake up call for the govt of America….It’s about time, isn’t it?

He didn’t have any especially easy access to guns; he purchased them totally legally. It’s in the Constitution (the 2nd Amendment) that every American has a right to bear arms, and he chose to do so. He passed background checks, and so forth. It’s not like he had a criminal record beforehand.

See although I think that there should be tighter gun controls in America and that assault rifles shouldn’t be allowed on the streets, I don’t think that banning guns would be the answer. That’s reactionary thinking, and many people go into automatic “recovery mode” when a traumatic event such as this happens. But it’s more important to step back and take a look at the big picture.

Cho passed the background checks, and all the requisite parameters for owning a gun. There’s no way anyone could’ve guessed that he was going to do what he did a month later.

No, this was simply an atrocity and a terrible day for America.

Ok! So here’s the deal…I totally agree with you abt him making the purchase legally…and that’s exactly my point….they need to change the 2nd amendment that you speak abt and I really think it’s high time! Afterall, going by what’s hppned in the past…shootings in elementary schools, high schools, the most recent one is Colorado…don’t you think things need to change?? After all, he bought one gun online…and yes he cleared the background checks and that’s my point…things have reached a stage where just running background checks isn’t enough and it’s pretty apparent with all that’s been hppning.

I also agree with you that the system here needs to change in terms of the attitude towards kids and the mocking etc…but I really think that’s secondary…no matter what the mental state or no matter what causes it and the end of the day, having access to guns i.e. purchasing them legally…is what led to this massacre. Had he not been able to buy the guns…this would have never hppned…he cldn’t have done the same thing with a knife, right??

Jyotsna, first off, I see your point. I’m not invalidating the fact that his purchase of the guns made it easier for this massacre to occur. But there are a few points about the 2nd Amendment that need to be brought to light.

I’m not sure how familiar you are with American history, but here’s why the “right to bear arms” was put into the Constitution in the first place– when America was under English rule, England, in its quest to quell the uprising and discontent of the American colonies banned all guns. It was illegal to own guns of any kind, and only the military was allowed to own it. It was oppression, pure and simple.

Thus, when America was formed, it was in the Constitution that each American should be allowed to own arms for their own protection, because who knows what the future may have held? Hundreds of years later, another ruler of America may have said, “It’s illegal for you to own guns, only my military can, and we will shoot and destroy anyone who disobeys.” The Second Amendment was a safety precaution taken by the Founding Fathers to prevent a military state/dictatorship from ever controlling America.

Now let’s fast forward to the 1920s. Prohibition was in full effect, and the sale of liquor was illegal. Did it mean that no one drank? No. Those who wanted to, found a way. Instead, huge underground mafias came into power (Al Capone in Chicago for instance) and turned America into a crime-infested nation, more so than before Prohibition was in place. Check out The Untouchables with Kevin Costner, Robert DeNiro, and Sean Connery. It’s about that period in history.

Last, let’s move to the present. If this gunman wanted to get a gun *that badly*, the truth is, he would have. History shows us that. And even if he didn’t get a gun, it’s notoriously easy to find out how to make a homemade bomb online. He could’ve done the same thing as Timothy McVeigh in Oklahoma City in 1995 and blown up hundreds.

Ultimately, it’s not a matter of controlling guns or changing the Constitution. The sad truth is simply that something out of the control of anyone happened. People look for someone to blame when an atrocity happens, and this is an easy target. Unfortunately there *is* no easy answer, and we have to live with the hard fact that perseverance probably would’ve led to the same result no matter what laws were enacted.

Thanks for the history lesson! ;) And yes I am aware of all of the above and on one level I also agree with you that no laws etc would have changed the situation. Yes, he could have made a bomb at home. Yes, he could have gotten a gun any which way, if he *really*wanted to. But here’s my point, to own a gun in this country, you just need to clear criteria such as age, have a clean criminal record and complete a firearm safety course. Now you tell me, do you really think passing these criteria is enough to own a weapon that can take away someone’s life? I don’t think so, my friend and incidents that have occurred in the past, make that CRYSTAL CLEAR. Now, this is what I’m talking about; I’m saying CHANGE the criteria. The Government needs to see what more it can do to make it tougher to own a gun in every State. Up until 1998, 31 States in the U.S. had a right-to-carry law and half the U.S. population lives in these States. Therefore, I strongly believe that these criteria have to change. Something has to be done. I guarantee you that in spite of doing this, there will still be shootings and crime, coz like you said people will do what they want to one way or another. But at least this would be a start to some sort of control over the crime in America. What do you think?

This response is actually going to be a much shorter one than before, because I’m just going to address one point which I believe take care of the entire post.

You say that tougher restrictions need to be enforced, but at the same breath, also say that even with tougher sanctions, “there will be shootings and crime.” So I ask you, what’s the point? How does that give any control whatsoever over “the crime in America?”

Lastly, what exactly would *be* the necessary tougher criteria for owning a gun? A degree from Harvard? A masters in Criminal Justice? Please, expound.

Dude! Your sarcasm is not going to help here, OK. The fact is that this guy was psychotic. And let me tell you….people with mental illnesses have shot people in the past as well, so NO, one does not need a degree from Harvard or a Masters in Criminal Justice to own a weapon. What they do need is to do what they are doing properly and add to it…so what kind of a background check do you think was done on him anyway??? His roommates, people who knew him, his classmates, his profs, even his family, EVERYONE knew he had a problem…he was even recommended out patient care, so do you see what the problem is? Obviously a good enough back ground check was NOT done. And let me tell you something here, you are contradicting yourself, coz in your earlier posting you’ve clearly said that a ban on liquor doesn’t mean people will STOP drinking…similarly a ban on guns or stricter laws doesn’t mean that people will throw away their weapons instantly or stop killing others and go on hugging everyone on the streets of America or anywhere else in the world for that matter…but what will happen is that crime rate will reduce, over a period of time Also, when I said “control over crime in America” I meant reduction. Makes sense?

Now what do you have to say abt the shootout at the Johnson Space Centre in Houston today, my friend???

[...] asked her to write because she had some very thoughtful responses to the Virginia Tech post I wrote about a week back, and I think she shouldn’t be pushed to the back of the site but be [...]

Leave a response

Do you want to be able to edit your comments and italicize, bold and delete wherever you see fit? Then maybe you should just become a registered user by clicking here

Your response:

Categories